According to a semi-established consensus among the intellectual elite in the West, there is no such person as God or any other supernatural being.

Exciting news for the new evangelization being called for by Pope Benedict XVI are the recent discoveries in "space-time geometry," prompting eminent physicists to assert the cosmos had to have a beginning and thus had to have a creator.

Can science prove or disprove the existence of God?

Is the discovery of the Higgs particle what Joe Biden would describe as a big. . . deal?

Neuroscience wants to be the answer to everything. It isn't.

Without Norman Borlaug's high-yield agriculture, millions would have starved.

The conflict between science and religion as a hypothesis has been rejected by practically every scholar in the field. Why is there such a rift between academic opinion and popular perception? And what has been the real relationship between science and religion?

I have no intent to demean scientists. I wish merely to see them for what they are, and to see their work for what it is, and to protect the polity from placing too much trust in their unacknowledged priesthood.

While priests are dedicated to theology as the "queen of sciences," some of them have contributed to the material sciences as well.

Fraud, bias make us wonder, can we ever believe the facts?