Is It Time to Restore the Full Psalter to the Liturgy of the Hours?

One of the great gifts of reading the Liturgy of the Hours (also called the Breviary) faithfully over the years is that the Scriptures become deeply impressed upon the mind, heart, memory, and imagination.  This is especially true of the psalms that are repeated every four weeks, all year long, every year.

But there are significant omissions in the modern Breviary.  This is true not merely because of the loss of the texts themselves, but that of the reflections on them.  The verses eliminated are labeled by many as imprecatory because they call for a curse or wish calamity to descend upon others.

Here are a couple of examples of these psalms:

Pour out O Lord your anger upon them; let your burning fury overtake them. ... Charge them with guilt upon guilt; let them have no share in your justice (Ps 69:25, 28).

Shame and terror be theirs forever.  Let them be disgraced; let them perish (Ps 83:18) 

Prior to the publication of the Liturgy of the Hours, Pope Paul VI decreed that the imprecatory psalms be omitted.  As a result, approximately 120 verses (three entire psalms (58[57], 83[82], and 109[108]) and additional verses from 19 others) were removed.  The introduction to the Liturgy of the Hours cites the reason for their removal as a certain "psychological difficulty" caused by these passages.  This is despite the fact that some of these psalms of imprecation are used as prayer in the New Testament (e.g., Rev 6:10) and in no sense as encouragement for the use of curses (General Instruction # 131).  Six of the Old Testament Canticles and one of the New Testament Canticles contain verses that were eliminated for the same reason.

Many (including me) believe that the removal of these verses is problematic.  In the first place, it does not really solve the problem of imprecation in the Psalter because many of the remaining psalms contain such notions.  Even in the popular 23rd Psalm, delight is expressed as our enemies look on hungrily while we eat our fill (Ps 23:5).  Here is another example from one of the remaining psalms:

Nations in their greatness he struck, for his mercy endures forever.  Kings in their splendor he slew, for his mercy endures forever (Ps 136:10, 17-18).

Because the general instruction speaks to "psychological difficulty" in regard to imprecation, I think it is good to recall that the overall context of prayer modelled in the Scriptures is one of frank disclosure to God of all of our emotions and thoughts, even the darkest ones.

Removing the "worst" verses does not remove the "problem."

A second issue is that it is troubling to propose that the inspired text of Scripture should be consigned to the realm of "psychological difficulty."  Critics assert that it should be our task to seek to understand such texts in the wider context of God's love and justice.  Some of the most teachable moments come in the difficult and "dark" passages.  Whatever "psychological difficulty" or spiritual unease these texts cause, all the more reason that we should wonder as to the purpose of such verses.  Why would God permit such utterances in a sacred text?  What does He want us to learn or understand?  Does our New Testament perspective add insight? 

While some want to explain them away as the utterances of a primitive, unrefined, or ungraced people and time, this seems unwise and too general a dismissal.  So easily does this view permit us to label almost anything we find objectionable or even unfashionable as coming from a "more primitive" time.  While it is true that certain customs, practices, punishments, and norms (e.g., kosher) fall away within the biblical period or in the apostolic age, unless this is proposed to us by the sacred texts or the Magisterium, we should regard the sacred text as being of perennial value.  Texts, even if not taken literally, should be taken seriously and pondered for their deeper and lasting meaning. 

St. Thomas Aquinas succinctly taught that an imprecatory verse can be understood in three ways:

First, as a prediction rather than a wish that the sinner be damned.  Unrepentant sinners will indeed be punished and possibly forever excluded from the Kingdom of the Righteous.

Second, as a reference to the justice of punishment rather than as gloating over the destruction of one's enemies.  It is right and proper that unrepented sins and acts of injustice be punished; it is not wrong to rejoice that justice is served.

Third, as an allegory of the removal of sin and the destruction of its power.  We who are sinners should rejoice to see all sinful drives within us removed.  In these verses, our sinful drives are often personified as our enemy or opponent.

As a priest, I encounter too many people who think that they cannot bring their dark and negative emotions to God. 

So, as St. Thomas taught, even troubling, imprecatory verses can impart important things.  They remind us that sin, injustice, and all evil are serious and that we are engaged in a kind of war until such things (and those who cling to them) are put away.  (For St. Thomas' fuller reflections, see the Summa Theologica, II-IIae, q. 25, a. 6, ad 3. You can also read a thoughtful essay by Gabriel Torretta, O.P., which served as a basis for my reflections.)

To all of this I would like to add a further reflection on the value and role of imprecation in the Psalter (including the omitted verses). 

Because the general instruction speaks to "psychological difficulty" in regard to imprecation, I think it is good to recall that the overall context of prayer modeled in the Scriptures is one of frank disclosure to God of all of our emotions and thoughts, even the darkest ones.  Moses bitterly laments the weight of office and even asks God to kill him at one point (Num 11:15).  Jonah, Jeremiah (15:16), and other prophets make similar laments.  David and other psalm writers cry out at God's delay and are resentful that sinners thrive while the just suffer.  At times they even take up the language of a lawsuit.  Frequently the cry goes up in the psalms, "How much longer, O Lord."  Even in the New Testament, the martyrs ask God to avenge their blood (Rev 6:10).  Jesus is later described as slaying the wicked with the sword (of his word) that comes from his mouth.  Yes, anger, vengeance, despair, doubt, and indignation are all taken up in the language of prayer in the Scripture.  It is an earthy, honest sort of prayer.

It is as if God is saying,

I want you to speak to me and pray out of your true dispositions, even if they are dark and seemingly disrespectful.  I want you to make them the subject of your prayer.  I do not want phony prayers and pretense.  I will listen to your darkest utterances.  I will meet you there and, having heard you, will not simply give you what you ask but will certainly listen.  At times, I will point to my final justice and call you to patience and warn you not to avenge yourself (Rom 12:19).  At other times, I will speak as I did to Job (38-41) and rebuke your perspective in order to instruct you.  Or I will warn you of the sin that underlies your anger and show you a way out, as I did with Cain (Gen 4:7) and Jonah (4:11).  At still other times I will just listen quietly, realizing that your storm passes as you speak to me honestly.  But I am your Father.  I love you and I want you to pray to me in your anger, sorrow, and indignation.  I will not leave you uninstructed and thereby uncounseled.

It is not obvious to me that speaking of these all-too-common feelings is a cause of psychological distress.  Rather, it is the concealing and suppressing of such things that causes psychological distress.

As a priest, I encounter too many people who think that they cannot bring their dark and negative emotions to God.  This is not healthy.  It leads to simmering anger and increasing depression.  Facing our negative emotions — neither demonizing them nor sanctifying them — and bringing them to God as Scripture models is the surer way to avoid "psychological distress."  God is our healer, and just as we must learn to speak honestly to a doctor, even more so to the Lord.  Properly understood (viz. St. Thomas), the imprecatory verses and other Scriptures model a way to pray in this manner.

Discussions of this sort should surely continue in the Church.  The imprecatory verses may one day be restored.  For now, the Church has chosen to omit the most severe of the imprecations.  I think we should reconsider this.  The complete Psalter given by God the Holy Spirit is the best Psalter.

Listen to this reading of one of the omitted psalms (109 [108]) and note its strong language.  But recall St. Thomas' reflections and remember that such verses, tough though they are, become teaching moments.  Finally, recall that these psalms were prayed in the Church until 1970.