Not too long after a glorious liturgical event in St. Peter's Square, I went out to lunch in the Piazza Navona with several American couples.
Father C. John McCloskey, III
During our conversation and enjoyment of Italian pasta, I took a close look at the next table. There was a group of seven or eight Italian men who were eating, drinking vino rosso, and engaging in boisterous conversation, clearly enjoying themselves. I got the impression that this was not a singular event but rather one of frequent meetings of long-time close friends. For some reason it seemed strange to me, and at the same time appealing.
Now I am not encouraging the ideal of men whiling away the hours with wine and song while their wives slave away with the cleaning and the cooking. However, upon reflection in the weeks afterward, I realized that the strangeness I felt on witnessing that scene came about because I rarely, if ever, encounter similar scenes in my own country. Virtually the only time I see groups of men meeting together on a regular basis is in front of a television -- at home or at a bar or restaurant -- watching a sporting event. The drink is there (beer rather than wine); the food is there (stacked sandwiches rather than pasta) but something is missing. More often than not, they are enjoying not each other, but rather the game. Now there is certainly nothing wrong with enjoying sports, together, whether as participants or as spectators. Nor is there anything wrong with most of the other hobbies and social activities that American men enjoy together. Still there often seems to be a deeper dimension of friendship that is missing.
Suddenly, as I reflected on my observations, there came to my mind a suspicion that there is a heretofore-undiagnosed disease common among American men -- a disease that could be responsible in part for some of our societal ills, and could even be a grave deterrent to an effective new evangelization in our country. I have named this disease the Friendship Deficit Syndrome (FDS).
The purpose of this essay is twofold. First I mean to describe some of the causes and symptoms of the syndrome, and offer some possible therapy. Second, I hope to offer some background on the importance of friendship, both human and supernatural, as a principal means of spreading the Gospel of Christ. We need to work out a new and better approach to developing friendships in America: an approach that is precisely American and respects the strength of American culture. This article is meant to provoke the reader to offer his own suggestions and solutions, because I believe we Americans are all facing a serious problem.
Friendship and evangelization
Friendship, for a Christian, can be an effective form of evangelization. In this context, evangelization means simply sharing our relationship with Christ -- cultivated through prayer, meditation on Holy Scripture, and the sacraments -- with our friends. This entails a friendship that is sincere and authentic, and certainly does not look upon friendship as a tool. Friendship is, and in a natural way must be recognized as, an end in itself. There are many examples in history and in literature of admirable friendships, and these examples do not necessarily involve religious faith. However friendship can be uplifted and supernaturalized when it reaches its highest level in sharing the ultimate good: God himself. To introduce or re-introduce Jesus Christ to another man is the greatest good of human friendship.
I hope that this article will help readers to understand the Friendship Deficit Syndrome and how damaging it can be for the human and supernatural development of men's personalities. With time, self-knowledge and God's help, if need be, men can be cured of it. They will be holier, happier, and more apostolic.
As you can see, I am addressing men, particularly Catholic men. But women who care about men -- mothers, sisters, wives, and prospective wives -- are encouraged to take a peek. After all, they should take strong interest in the true Christian manliness of the males in their lives. Their own livelihood and happiness, and that of their children, may depend on the ability of the men they love to cope with the increasingly perilous culture in which we find ourselves.
Women must remember that before the Christian faith exerted its influence on the laws and morals in the ancient world of the Mediterranean, wives and children were often viewed as mere chattel at the absolute disposal of the paterfamilias -- to the point that the man often assumed the right to put unsatisfactory women and children to death. Those ancient attitudes are not completely dead, even today; there is similar treatment of women and children still on display in some cultures. This sort of tyranny could repeat itself even in Western cultures, or we might see the development of new forms of what Pope John Paul II has called the "new totalitarianism" which increasingly envelops us in the West. The witness of strong men, willing to be confessors and martyrs for their faith, may be the best possible protection for marriage and the family.
Moreover, in coping with the Friendship Deficit Syndrome, wives can play an important role by encouraging their husbands to spend more time with their friends. In today's society there always will be tensions in balancing work, family, and social life. Those women who work outside the home and still have to take care of the domestic chores understandably want their husbands home as much as possible in the evenings and on weekends. However, if a wife insists that the husband always be at home when he is not at work, she may be denying him the opportunity to make himself a better husband and father -- and at the same depriving other men of the good example and influence her husband could provide. Although friendship is always personal, a wife should desire that her husband have the opportunity to make as many friends as she has.
The pursuit of loneliness
The FDS actually may be among the causes of what is perhaps the greatest plague affecting modern-day American society: loneliness. The causes of this plague are multiple: small families (brought about through contraception and abortion); absent fathers and mothers (attributable in large part to legalized divorce and to the pressure for women to work outside the home as a result of a tax system that does not favor the family); frequent family moves that bring about a lack of stability and loss of touch with one's roots (attributable to individuals and corporations that rate economic profits more highly than family concerns); a tendency to value material possessions above human relationships; the worship of youth. This disorder is indeed grave.
As one author put it some years ago, "the average American male has one good friend, and that is his wife." Anyone who has spent an appreciable time in a country with a Catholic cultural background (regardless of the current level of religious practice in that country) should notice that American men have been deeply affected by the overwhelmingly Protestant culture of our own past, with its emphasis on individualism. There is a very powerful image of the strong, isolated male figure in American culture: the autonomous adventurer who rides off into the sunset, fleeing the confines of civilized life; the man who hides his private feelings behind a crusty exterior, impervious to forces outside him; the man who is ultimately answerable only to his own conscience.
Of course there is also another, very different popular image of the American man: the shallow, fast-talking, "man on the make," constantly ogling women and looking for a way to make a fast buck. His every thought is known, perhaps because he has so few and they are spoken out loud. Now I exaggerate somewhat here to make my point, but I think these two cultural images can be readily recognized. In fact they are embodied in two icons of American films in the 20th century, John Wayne and Bob Hope. (It is interesting that both actors happily ended their days by asking for reception into the Catholic Church.)
Now when I criticize the image of the autonomous male, I hope it is understood that I am not trying to turn the average American Catholic male into a slobbering, emotive, weakling. A healthy man must grow in, maintain, and practice all the masculine virtues that we find in nature and that are augmented by the effects of supernatural grace. He should glory in all that makes him truly virile. In short I am not turning around the question made famous by Henry Higgins to ask, "Why can't a man be more like a woman?" I am simply (I don't say it is easy) saying that the very definition of what it means to be a Catholic man should include the capacity to "make a sincere gift of self" -- to use the phrase from the Second Vatican most often quoted by that exemplary model of Catholic manhood, Pope John Paul II. This "gift of self" is made primarily in holy matrimony, but it is made as well in the male friendships that he has throughout the course of his life.
Causes and symptoms
Apart from their participation in the more rugged sports (and even that traditionally male enclave is now subject to feminine encroachment), many young men have relatively little opportunity to enjoy exclusively male company. The decline in single-sex colleges and high schools, together with the shrinking of such former bastions of American boyhood as the Boy Scouts, have made it more difficult to form deep and lasting friendships from an early age. Many formerly all-male clubs and fraternal associations are now open to women. Even the military services have come to be increasingly integrated (with sometimes disastrous results, including a great relaxation of discipline and esprit de corps, and the sexual promiscuity that prudent observers should have recognized as inevitable). It has also become increasingly rare for a man to work for only one or two employers in the course of his career. As a result it is less likely that his fellow workers will become and remain close friends, and more likely that they may be seen as competitors for continued employment or advancement. Finally, the extraordinary mobility of the contemporary American family -- ready to relocate from coast to coast and state to state in response to economic forces -- can cost a man the time he needs to form and sustain the neighborhood relationships that turn into friendship.
As things stand today, for many Catholic men "friendship" can mean a largely artificial tie, based on a common interest in beer, cars, sports, hunting, fishing, or even an unhealthy interest in the pursuit of young women. (In fact I hesitate to use the word "friendship" to describe this relationship; would "acquaintance" be a better term?) A real male friendship is a deep and lasting bond that goes to the very core of what a man is or can be.
To complicate matters still further, in today's society many male relationships are openly homosexual, based on the use of each other as objects of pleasure. Many forms of public entertainment -- films, television, and the theater -- have accepted homosexuality as normal, and begun to portray heterosexual males as fools who live under the sway of domineering women. One of the many unhappy side-effects of this open public perversion is the fact that when any small group of adult males is seen together, at least in some urban centers, they are assumed to be homosexuals.
At the same time, the growing number of young American men who come from broken families -- where a man has cast off his wife -- suffer from the absence of virtuous male role models. The enormous defection from the Catholic priesthood over the last 30 years and the ensuing sex-abuse scandals have also played a role in undermining strong male friendships. Having been disillusioned by paternal abandonment, or the example of priests' infidelity to their vocation, they find themselves incapable of giving or receiving the trust and healthy affection that is essential to forming deep and lasting friendships.
These, in brief, are some of the causes and symptoms of FDS.
What is friendship?
Before considering a cure, we should give at least some quick consideration to the essence of friendship, how the ancients saw it, and how it became elevated by Christianity to a still greater good that is a necessary and natural means of evangelization.
Friendship, of course, is a natural good in itself, inasmuch as man is a social creature. "It is not good for man to be alone." That Biblical observation applies not only to marriage but also to man's relationships with his fellow men. Any human person, formed in the image of Holy Trinity, exists in relation to others and indeed is defined by his relationships. For the vast majority of men, aside from his marriage and his family, the most important relationships will be friendships with other men. (There can also be forms of friendship between men and women outside marriage, but for the man committed to a life of apostolic celibacy or for a man already committed to one woman, these friendships normally have to maintain a certain distance and reserve.)
Two of the greatest writers of classical antiquity placed the highest value on human friendship. Aristotle tells us in the Nicomachean Ethics: "Without friends, no one would choose to live, though he had all other goods... it would seem actually impossible to be a great friend of many people; love ideally is an excess of friendship and that can be felt towards only one person; therefore great friendship too can be felt towards few people." Yet Aristotle could not imagine how the added power of divine grace would enable men such as the saints to love each other with the infinite power of the heart of Christ.
Cicero, in his treatise On Friendship, tells us "Friendship can only exist between good men. For there is nothing more loveable than virtue," and also, "I can only advise you to prefer friendship to all other things within human attainment."
The Christian philosophers and theologians also speak to us of the importance of friendship. St. Augustine tells us in a startlingly direct way, "No one can be known for who he is except through the friends he has." St. Augustine's mentor, St. Ambrose, says that "a friendship that can end was never a real friendship." St. Thomas Aquinas, the Angelic Doctor, writing in his treatise On Charity tells us: "Perfect friendship is not directed toward many.... but inasmuch as friendship toward one becomes more perfect as regards that one, the more perfect the love we have toward one, the better we are able to love others." He also adds, in his commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, "It is proper of a friend to do good to his friends, principally to those most in need."
Friendship in Revelation
The most notable and moving example of friendship in the Old Testament is that of David and Jonathan, the son of his enemy King Saul. After David's introduction to Saul, the first Book of Samuel (18:5) relates: "When he had finished speaking to Saul, the soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul." David's elegy over Saul and Jonathan is one of the most beautiful poems of the Bible. After Jonathan's death in a battle that enables David to claim his kingship, David exclaims, "I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan; very pleasant you have been to me; your love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women." (2 Sam 1:26)
Now we come to the Christian revelation on friendship and relationship, which begins with the Supreme mystery of our Faith, the Holy Trinity. We believe that God is One in Three, and that the Three Persons are defined by their relations to one another. We could say, analogously, that there exists the most sublime, perfect, and eternal "friendship" between the Persons of the Trinity, expressed eternally and through the coming of the Son of God, which is communicated to us afterwards in a permanent way through the sanctifying Spirit: Love given, Love received, Love shared.
Jesus Christ, the Savior, tells us, "I have called you friends." Friendship with Christ is the very purpose of the life of the Christian, as he is the way, the truth, and the life. He grew up as the very reason and heart of the Holy Family, and thus felt the human love and affection of Mary, his mother, and St. Joseph, his guardian, during his hidden life. As he entered into his public life he calls the twelve apostles -- who are not only his closest disciples but also his friends, with all their obvious defects, with whom he shares himself as completely as far as he can on this side of heaven.
Indeed our Lord shows an unequal love for his apostles, just as any one of us does with our own friends. He allowed the inner circle -- Peter, James, and John -- to witness him at the moment of greatest glory in his transfiguration, and at his most excruciating moment, the beginning of the Passion with the Agony in the Garden. He often corrected them but always forgave them, as after Peter's case of betrayal, with the divine mercy of his Sacred Heart. He even called Judas his friend, seconds before Judas betrayed him with a kiss. He made friends of Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus, and no doubt would have become friends with Herod and Pontius Pilate if their hearts were not hardened.
We see friendship, too, in the examples of the apostles themselves. Upon receiving their calling, they are eager to share it with their friends. Andrew brings his brother Peter to Jesus; Philip brings his friend, Nathaniel, John most likely brings his brother James. After Pentecost, the Church begins to grow rapidly. Within 75 years after the Resurrection, there are what we now know as dioceses in major cities throughout the span of the Roman empire, complete with bishops, priests, and deacons. There are thousands of Christian families of all social classes, from slaves up to members of the imperial household. This growth continues through another 200 years, all the while under the ban of the Roman empire, with intermittent and increasingly bloody persecutions. There were certainly no civil or social advantages to being a Christian. Yet by 313, while claiming the allegiance of only 10 percent of the population of the Roman Empire, the infant Church won toleration with the Edict of Milan, and within another 75 years was recognized as the official Church of Rome, and Christian morals were gradually introduced into the law of the empire.
All of this was the work of the Holy Spirit. Yet because God works normally through secondary causes, we can ask: How did it all come about, in human terms?
First let us acknowledge how it did not happen. It did not happen because of full diocesan seminaries, monasteries, religious orders and congregations. It did not happen because of a large system of parochial grammar schools, high schools, and universities. It did not happen as a result of diocesan plans for evangelization. It did not happen because of the widespread distribution of formal catechetical material through books, radio, television, and the internet. It did not happen under the influence of great Christian art, architecture, and literature that was accessible to all. It did not happen as the result of strong papal leadership and magisterial teaching.
I should hasten to add that I am in favor of all the above influences. But they simply did not exist in the first centuries of Christianity -- nor indeed for many centuries afterwards.
The growth of primitive Christianity in those first centuries was, I suggest, the result of the same influence that will be the key to the "new evangelization" of the third Christian millennium. It was due to the prayer, sacramental life, moral behavior, and charitable works of Christian persons and families, who communicated their love of Christ and his Church to the people around them through friendship.
The wonderful example of charity of the first Christians, particularly in their willingness to risk their lives in taking care of the victims of the intermittent plagues that struck during the first centuries of the Christian era, no doubt had a powerful role in evangelization. So did the attractiveness of the moral life of Christian families. However, without the personal influence of friendship, all otherwise useful and admirable means of evangelization and apostolate would have been largely ineffective.
The transformation of culture in all its various aspects, which is both a goal and an inevitable result of the "new evangelization," must take place in the secular world; it cannot be brought about within the confines of quasi-ecclesiastical structures. This transformation will require a personal commitment, on the part of each Christian, to share his faith with his neighbors at home, in the workplace, and in the variegated world of sport, music, government, media, art, literature, etc.
As mentioned earlier, friendship is a great good and end in itself. Although there can be many different measures by which to judge our success in life in worldly terms, and although we recognize as Christians that earthly success means nothing at the time of the particular judgment, still there is at least one measure that applies both naturally and supernaturally: the number of friends we leave behind, and the quality of those friendships. So as a calculation of our "net worth," we might ask ourselves a series of questions:
- How many true friends do I have?
- How many friends would lay down their lives for me, and I for them?
- How many people are there to whom I can go to open up my heart and soul with total trust?
- If I were to die today, how many people would care -- would miss me for more than a few days? How many would come to my funeral?
- How many lives were changed in a positive way by my friendship?
- How many persons were reconciled, converted, or grew in the life of the Church on account of my friendship?
- Finally, are my friendships a fundamental part of my prayer life? Do I talk about my friends -- pleading for their needs and trying to better my understanding of them, with The Friend?
The example of the saints
All of the saints, in one way or another, present us with models of apostolic friendship. However, I believe that the greatest role model in this regard, at least for Catholic men, is the patron of lawyers, politicians, and statesman: St. Thomas More. He was arguably the greatest man of his day, during the early Renaissance of 16th century Europe. A top jurist and corporate attorney, he held the highest office in his land as Chancellor of England. A great man of letters, he was at the same time a skilled defender of the faith against the heresies of Luther. A great family man, deeply beloved by his wife and children, he was at the same time a man of deep prayer and sacramental life, practiced on a daily basis in the midst of his family life and professional work.
However, for the purposes of this article, what was most striking about St. Thomas More was his gift for friendship. He knew and was loved by many of the leading religious, scientific, and literary figures of Europe in his day -- including more than a few with whom he had very serious disagreements. When coming to England, they made a special point of spending as much time as possible with Thomas More and his family. His personal influence endures down to this day through the biographies, films, and plays that continue to portray the extraordinary life he lived with such apparent normalcy. He was not only "a man for all seasons" but also a perfectly balanced man, who always put his prayer, his family, and his friends above all other concerns. As such, he was able to lay down his life willingly and with good humor when virtually all around him betrayed Jesus Christ and his Church.
I also want to mention another example of friendship, in a man who is still with us, Karol Woytla. I am sure one day there will be a book entitled The Friendships of Pope John Paul II. Throughout his pontificate -- both in the Vatican (at meals or in private audiences) and on his dozens of apostolic journeys -- the Holy Father has always made time for his personal friendships, some of them going back to his childhood and continuing through his years at university, seminary, as a priest, bishop, and cardinal. If there ever was a man who could claim that his work did not leave time for personal relationships, it is the Pope. Yet somehow he always finds the time; he knows the value of friendship. How many hundreds or thousands of people claim to be personal friends of the Pope?
Being a friend
There is an old expression: To make a friend, be a friend." It is important to make a distinction between "acquaintances," of whom we may have hundreds or thousands, and "friends." Friendship is a sacred word, full of meaning, and one I do not use lightly. Friendship, ideally, is forever.
Friendship requires spending time with another. There are no short cuts. Whether it is at meals, or a shared interest in sport or a hobby, or even during a pilgrimage, we need to share who we are and what we have to give, in order to receive the same gift from our friend.
Certainly friendship may grow through correspondence, but in one way or another, we have to be "present" to our friends. We cannot really say that true friendship exists until we have opened up the deepest human questions: who man is, where he comes from, where he is headed, the meaning of life, the value of suffering. True friends talk about what is most important to them: faith, family, work. And this exploration of serious topics helps friendships to become apostolic. Such friendships lead men to grow and be transformed in Christ, with the inevitable result of creating a Christian environment (whether small or large) around them. Friendship also means loving our friends with all their faults; we forgive them when necessary, and although out of charity, from time to time, we correct them.
Strong male friendship must be revived if Catholic men and their progeny are to get on with the holy and ambitious task in this young millennium: to build the civilization of love and truth in the 21st century. The future of American as a state, society, and culture depends upon it. As the sole remaining world power today, America's influence is enormous, for good or evil. I believe that either America will become a largely Catholic country in the course of this century or America may well cease to be (at least in the form we now know), and that the personal apostolate of friendship is the key to the transformation of our society.
To be sure, we need many holy, courageous, and zealous bishops and priests, who will preach the word of Christ and administer his sacraments, deeply influenced by the message of the Second Vatican Council and its authentic interpretation. I am confident we will get them. However, the Gospel will be most effectively spread throughout society not from the sanctuary of the local parishes but through friendship.
Father C. John McCloskey, III, STD, "Friendship: The Key to the Evangelization of Men." Catholic World Report (May 2004).
Reprinted with permission of Catholic World Report and Father C. John McCloskey, III, STD.
Father C. John McCloskey, III is a Catholic priest of the Prelature of Opus Dei and member of the Priestly Society of the Holy Cross. He is currently a Church historian and research fellow at the Faith and Reason Institute. Father McCloskey is the former director of the Catholic Information Center of the Archdiocese of Washington. He worked on Wall Street — Citibank and Merrill Lynch — for some years before becoming a priest, being ordained in 1981 by Cardinal Roger Etchegaray.
Fr. McCloskey is perhaps best known for having helped many people convert to Catholicism, including Newt Gingrich, Sam Brownback, Lawrence Kudlow, and Dr. Bernard Nathanson, a prominent pro-life activist who was converted from being a Pro-choice NARAL founder in his earlier years as a doctor, where he performed thousands of abortions.Copyright © 2008 Catholic World Report
back to top