The number one trusted online resource for Catholic values
Menu
A+ A A-

Can America Remain the Land of Religious Liberty?

  • RAY NOTHSTINE

Independence Day reminds us that there is no greater offering America gives to the world than its example of and contributions to religious liberty.


madison.jpg
James Madison
1751-1836

The American Revolution elevated self-government, the importance of virtue, and a liberal religious freedom.  Today, secularism and centralized power threaten these principles.

At the drafting of the Virginia Declaration of Rights in 1776, George Mason called for "the fullest toleration in the exercise of religion."  But a much younger representative named James Madison sought to improve the language and rewrote the statement this way:  "All men are equally entitled to the full and free exercise of religion according to the dictates of conscience."  "Toleration" suggests rights granted or bestowed by the state, which could one day be revoked.  Madison biographer Richard Brookhiser explained the American founder's thinking this way, "No one could be said to allow men to worship as they wished; they worshipped as they wished because it was their right as men."

Sending us backward, not forward, secularization and centralization of power is making us more distant from America's high tide of religious freedom.  Bureaucratic and governmental rulings hand down decrees that reflect an expanding state and increasingly indicate that religious freedom is protected only as long as it's restricted to houses of worship and the home.   

A few examples of current threats to religious liberty (a partial list) are the HHS Mandate, discrimination against Christians in public schools and universities, new restrictions on Christian adoption agencies, and a New York City ban on churches renting public schools for worship space.

These measures violate the rights of conscience and suggest faith is subservient to civil authority.  Many Americans ignore or even support these policies, trusting that an expanded state will care for their every whim and need.  But might we be gaining a feeling of political protection while losing spiritual freedom? In his book Christendom in Dublin, G.K.  Chesterton declares, "Wherever the people do not believe in something beyond the world, they will worship the world.  But, above all, they will worship the strongest thing in the world."  The weakening of Americans' religious faith, it seems, has made them vulnerable to the appeal of an omnipotent state.

The American Founders disagreed about many things, but there was virtually universal agreement about the importance of virtue and religion in America.  This was true even among those who were not orthodox in their Christianity.  They knew that self-government required virtue and a strong religious influence.  Religion itself served as the conscience of the state as well as limiting that state's power.  And it is the catalyst for free people to cultivate and expand liberties.

They knew that self-government required virtue and a strong religious influence.

The Liberty Bell, a powerful symbol of American Independence, bears an inscription from Leviticus 25:10: "Proclaim Liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof."  It's a reminder of the centrality of religious freedom and that civil authority is subservient to a higher power.

While it's true that religious persecution in this country doesn't rival more extreme forms elsewhere (it's estimated that over 270 Christians are martyred daily for their faith), this is no reason to be complacent as religious liberty is chipped away.

Millions of immigrants flocked to America because of its religious freedom and helped to foster a kind of liberty that is unique and sacred around the world.  But today many Americans often think of religion less as the guard and cultivator of liberty and more as a hindrance.  This thinking in itself exposes the perilous threat to religious liberty in America and is alien to our founding.

Recapturing the fullness of religious liberty in America will require winning more than a few court cases.  It will require a fundamental shift in how we view God and man and his relationship to the state.

This is Meaghen Gonzalez, Editor of CERC. I hope you appreciated this piece. We curate these articles especially for believers like you.

Please show your appreciation by making a $3 donation. CERC is entirely reader supported.

dividertop

Acknowledgement

Ray Nothstine. "Can America Remain the Land of Religious Liberty?" Acton Commentary (June 26, 2013).

Reprinted with permission of the Acton Institute.

The Author

Ray Nothstine is Associate Editor at the Acton Institute, and Managing Editor of Religion & Liberty. In 2005 Ray graduated with a Master of Divinity (M.Div) degree from Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Ky. He also holds a B.A. in Political Science from The University of Mississippi in Oxford. Before coming to Acton, Ray worked as a free-lance writer for several organizations, including the Institute on Religion and Democracy. He gained ministry experience in churches in Mississippi and Kentucky. After college, he also served on the staff of U.S. Congressman Gene Taylor (D-Miss) in Gulfport in 2001-02. The son of a retired Air Force pilot, Ray has also lived in Okinawa, Philadelphia, New England, Hawaii, and Egypt.

Copyright © 2013 Acton Institute

Interested in keeping Up to date?

Sign up for our Weekly E-Letter

* indicates required