Sex Education: What Works?STAN WEED
Have abstinence education programs been shown to work and if so what are the characteristics of effective abstinence education programs?
Stan Weed: Based on our surveys of tens of thousands of middle school and high school students, we find at least six important predictors:
Stan Weed: Our analysis of over 100 abstinence programs finds that effective programs have "adequate dosage" — enough sessions to impact students more than superficially. Such programs also go beyond merely providing biological information and address multiple predictors of sexual behavior such as those I just mentioned.
They utilize effective teachers — who engage students, gain their respect, model the abstinence from sex outside marriage lifestyle, and believe in their ability to impact the sexual attitudes and behavior of their students. They are clear, direct, and unapologetic about the abstinence message.
These programs also recognize that risk behaviors such as sex, drug use, and drinking often occur in clusters and have common roots. Finally, effective programs conduct quality evaluation and use the data to improve the program.
Stan Weed: We looked at 115 evaluation studies in Emerging Answers, a 2007 report which claimed that two-thirds of comprehensive sex education programs had "positive behavioral effects." But a close look at the data showed that no school-based comprehensive sex education program lowered teen pregnancy or STD rates for any period of time. After 12 months, only two programs delayed the onset of teen sexual intercourse, and only 3 of the 115 programs increased frequency of condom use. No program produced consistent condom use for even 6 months.
On the other side of the debate, evidence is emerging showing that well-designed abstinence education programs can be effective. Five peer-reviewed studies of abstinence education curricula have found positive effects still present one to two years after the program.
Heritage Keepers and Reasons of the Heart, a year after program participation, reduced the number of teens who became sexually active by about one-half. Choosing the Best showed a 60% reduction in teen sexual debut one year after the program.
Sex Can Wait significantly delayed the onset of teen sex 18 months after the program. And Promoting Health Among Teens! (Abstinence-Only Intervention) significantly reduced teen sexual debut a full two years after the program.
So, if you use the criteria each side in the debate recommends — reduced sexual activity in the case of abstinence ed., and reduced pregnancy and STDs and consistent condom in the case of comprehensive sex ed. — and you follow the target group for at least 12 months, there is actually somewhat more evidence for abstinence education than for comprehensive sex education.
For Programs, Organizations, & Speakers Promoting Abstinencee go here.
For Books on Sex and Character go here.
For Quotes about Abstinence go here.
For other resources on Sex Education go here.
Stan Weed. "Sex Education: What Works? An Interview with Stan Weed." excellence & ethics (Winter/Spring, 2014): 5.
Reprinted with permission. excellence & ethics is an education letter published by the Center for the 4th and 5th Rs. It features articles, research, and K-12 best practices that help school leaders, teachers, students, parents, and community members do their best work (performance character) and do the right thing (moral character).
Dr. Stan Weed is director of the Institute for Research & Evaluation and a leading researcher on abstinence education. He is author of a chapter on abstinence education in the forthcoming handbook, Sex Education. Email Stan Weed at WeedStan@aol.com. Visit the Institute for Research and Evaluation: http://instituteresearch.com/
Copyright © 2014 Center for the 4th and 5th Rs
Not all articles published on CERC are the objects of official Church teaching, but these are supplied to provide supplementary information.